Farrington’s artistic work tends to look at the lives and sufferings of blacks that they have faced since the early 19th century. She uses portraits of naked black people to argue her case out. On the contrary, Agosin’s artistic work looks at the Mexican and Latin worlds. Agosin uses a portrait of a dancing white woman making the work totally undesirable for the commissioning work. Both works portray a sharp contrast in terms of time, place, and theme. This paper will analyze the artistic works of Farrington and Agosin in an attempt to derive judgment on the one that is best suited for the commissioning of black society’s achievement in the US.
Farrington’s artistic work is best suited for the commissioning of African culture and heritage work than that one of Agosin. Her deep knowledge of African artifacts underpins her case, thus qualifying her to take charge of the commissioning of black culture’s work. Looking at their works in three-dimensional angles, that is, time, place, and theme criteria helps one to identify the best-suited artist. Going briefly through the work of Farrington, one will notice that her work addresses deeply the issues that are pertinent and have continued to worry about black people in the US since the early 19th century. The picture is based on the black’s settings of society. Thus, its place can be claimed to be occupied by the ailment that has affected blacks for too long. It is clear evidence that Farrington’s work had an overall theme of addressing African-American’s adversities.
Looking at the other artistic work that was done by Agosin, one will be able to identify some disparities when compared with Farrington’s work. First, Agosin addresses contemporary issues that worry Latin Americans, whereas Farrington addresses issues that have continued to trouble blacks in America since time immemorial. Its setting or place is in Latin America, thus, making it unsuitable in addressing any adversities that affect blacks. Moreover, it tries to address issues that are thorny in Mexico, making the portrait’s theme to be a totally contradicting scenario to the one expected to be commissioned. As a result, Agosin is put at a disadvantaged angle since the artistic work is incompatible with the theme of work that is about to be commissioned. However, the paper will go deeper into analyzing the works of two artists’.
Analysis of Farrington’s Work
Farrington is a renowned artist who has created a lot of masterpieces of arts. She did some work that was signed with the assessment of the writer. It was a book that she created back in 2005. It is titled as Creating Their Own Image: The History of African-American Women Artists. The size of this book is 7-11/16 x 10-7/8 inches and has 368 pages. The cover has a picture drawn on a piece of paper that is acid-free. It depicts three images of black naked people, two of which are sculptures and one is a photo.
These three persons are naked and their complexions are different. The first person, a woman, seems to be dark in color, being the darkest of them all. The skin of the second woman is not as dark as that of the first one with the third person, a man, being the lightest. The images depict the art of the slavery era. They represent the professional vanguard of the 19th century. The Harlem Renaissance and New Negro are at the core of the portrait’s theme. It was a Negro deal, which was dubbed as a new deal. It could also symbolize civil rights that the blacks were fighting for.
The artist is observed not to use the language that was a gender-specific when she was making the generic statement. The practice was in line with the work of Thomas Eakins, who was a renowned artist of his time. Therefore, the main theme of the artwork will simply be symbolizing how blacks’ rights were infringed upon since they were considered inferior to the other races.
Description of the Object That the Preferred Artist, Farrington, Will Commission
Therefore, Farrington can perfectly fit into the commissioning work since she has enough skills in doing black artwork. The portrait should portray the daily endurances that a black man passes through on a daily basis in the US. Therefore, the portrait does not equally portray naked people. The drawings will depict different people who are clothed differently. In fact, they should be three in number. Their choice of attire should be the subject of discussion.
The first person should be dressed in traditional African attire and the face should depict no happiness at all, so the person should be sad. The second person should be dressed in a modern way while the third one should be in most modern clothes. Moreover, the third person should portray the face of a happy man. Of course, they should be in the upright posture and should be veristic. They should show settings that have different illumination starting from the blurred one to the very bright light. The object will be used in various commemoration held by the black community in the US. Therefore, it will be used to accentuate on advocating for the equality of this community in order for it to feel that it has freedom.
Description of How the Three-In-One Black Persons’ Drawing Should Look Like
|A portrait of a black person dressed in traditional attires||A portrait of a black person who is dressed in modern clothes that are of the old school||A portrait of a black person wearing modern clothes|
|The person’s face depicts sadness||The person looks dull||The person looks very happy|
|He/she is struggling to stand upright||He/she is standing upright but still seems not comfortable||He/she is comfortable standing upright|
|The background should be dark||The background is still dark albeit it is having some sort of illumination||This time the background is bright since now it is well illuminated|
Meanwhile, the drawings of the three persons should be able to display some symbolic meaning. The first person should be able to depict the oppression error, during which black people have never had any say in the US. They lacked total freedom such as being denied the right to vote. The second person depicts a human who looks dull and frowns. This person symbolizes the era, after which African-Americans were at least allowed to access some freedoms, such as the right to voting. Despite this, most of their rights were still infringed upon.
They were subjected to various types of discrimination. The last person symbolizes the modern black man. Despite him being an African-American and a minority in the US, he enjoys most of his rights. He is now a happy man. It can be evidenced by the American act of softening of their stand towards blacks. However, this portrait on the book cover should observe some rules. First of all, the book should follow the rules and guidelines that are set in order for it to enjoy the publication. It includes such aspects as double spacing when writing anything and putting it in an inset quotation.
MMA (Metropolitan Museum of Art) As the Best Criteria for Choosing the Best Artist
The artistic work that Farrington has done made her more suitable to commission the intended portrait. The judgment was arrived at after going through a piece of the artist’s work that has been highlighted earlier. Through the images of black people, Farrington wanted to communicate to the world about adversities that blacks were passing through. The artistic work creates a fighting theme that has remained there among the hearts of black people. The image was to be used to show how slavery had infringed on the blacks’ rights.
The portrait exemplifies the African-American comprehensive history of black people. It ranges from the slavery days to the current day. Farrington offers an argument that African-American people have resulted in coming up with the desired mode of representation. The portrait shows how colored people should be represented in American society. In addition, it shows how these people are represented in the culture of Americans. The image symbolizes a condition where fundamental human rights need to be upheld. There should be a system through which their experiences and emotions should be prioritized just like those of any other group.
According to an Art Bulletin that was written in 1991 (Brilliant), a profession in modern history that started to develop from the middle of the 19th century required timely and historical communication means. It could perhaps be the reason why Farrington had to do her artwork. For instance, the portrait addresses issues that were ailing black people and in the general black community in the United States. Coincidentally, abuse of the black community was rampant in the middle of the 19th century. It continues to address various progress that is made towards the attainment of freedom. The conclusion can be derived from the fact that the third picture is of a light-skinned man. It symbolizes that black people and indeed the entire population of blacks are slowly gaining freedom in the US.
Therefore, the artist of this portrait, Farrington, is qualified to carry out the commissioning. The theme of the work that is to be commissioned is based on African life. The challenges that they pass through pertain freedom suffocation despite this menace reducing with time. The artist is highly perfect in illustrating it whereby she communicates it by the lightening of the skin of the third person. It shows that despite him being black, his freedom is now considered just like that one of the whites.
Scrutiny of Agosin’s work
The artwork of Farrington was compared with another one that was done by Marjorie Agosin. The title of it was dubbed as A Woman’s Gaze: Essays on Latin American Women Artists. Its size is 9.3 x 6.2 x 0.9 inches. It was written in 1998. However, another person known as Agueda Dicancro was behind the making of the portrait. Artists of this portrait cannot be commissioned since their work is totally different from the theme of the work that is intended to be undertaken. First, it intends to address the contemporary issues that prevail in Mexico. It can be evidenced by the picture of a woman who seems to be a ballet dancer in a specific dress. In addition, the dancing woman seems happy.
Moreover, the woman is white making the choice of this artist to do the commissioning objectionable. It tries to expound more on the fabricated cultural practices and heritage of Latin America. This analysis depicts that there is a conflicting interest between it and the first portrait since their time, place, and themes are mottled. Therefore, it shows that artists of these portraits cannot in the first place commission any portrait dealing with African culture in a perfect way. The artist demonstrates little skills in terms of commissioning work that deals with African issues and their desire to get their rights. There is a desire to address issues that affect people in Latin America.
Farrington’s Work Is the Best Suited for the Commissioning Work
The time of Agosin’s portraits contradicts with the African one. It tries to address inequalities that are contemporary. The African portrait addresses issues that are pertinent and have continued to bother black people since time immemorial. Therefore, it is clear that it is beyond the empirical evidence that the African portrait was the best suited for the commissioning work. Furthermore, the artist, Farrington, demonstrated strong sense and deep knowledge through submitting the book about black women. Farrington knew the rules that are applied in the submission of a subscript, such as not putting the name on the title page. In short, the book could have no comparison when it came to choosing the best artist. Therefore, the work that the artist had done made her qualified for carrying out the commission of the intended artwork.